# Apple HIG Audit Scorecard

**App Name:** [Name]
**Platform:** [iOS / macOS / visionOS / watchOS]
**Auditor:** [Name]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

---

## 1. Visual Design & Aesthetic (0-20 pts)
Score: /20

- [ ] **Liquid Glass Compliance**: Does it use translucency and layers effectively?
- [ ] **Typography**: Is San Francisco used? Are text styles semantic?
- [ ] **Color**: Are semantic colors used (Light/Dark mode support)?
- [ ] **Spacing**: Is the 8pt grid followed?

**Notes:**

---

## 2. Navigation & Layout (0-20 pts)
Score: /20

- [ ] **Platform Native**: Does it use native paradigms (Tab Bar, Sidebar, etc.)?
- [ ] **Reachability**: (iOS only) Are primary actions at the bottom?
- [ ] **Safe Areas**: Are items clear of Dynamic Island / Home Indicator?
- [ ] **Information Density**: Is there enough white space (Deference)?

**Notes:**

---

## 3. Accessibility (0-30 pts)
Score: /30

- [ ] **VoiceOver**: All elements have labels and hints?
- [ ] **Tap Targets**: All buttons min 44x44pt?
- [ ] **Dynamic Type**: Does the layout scale without clipping?
- [ ] **Contrast**: Min 4.5:1 ratio for text?

**Notes:**

---

## 4. Interaction & Motion (0-20 pts)
Score: /20

- [ ] **Feel**: Are animations fluid and spring-based?
- [ ] **Feedback**: Are haptics used appropriately for actions?
- [ ] **Predictability**: Do standard gestures (swipe, pinch) work as expected?

**Notes:**

---

## 5. Platform Features (0-10 pts)
Score: /10

- [ ] **Native Integration**: Does it use Dynamic Island, Live Activities, or Complications?
- [ ] **Shortcuts**: (macOS) Comprehensive keyboard shortcuts?

**Notes:**

---

## Final Score: /100

### 🟢 85-100: App Store Ready
Highly compliant. Ready for official review or featuring.

### 🟡 70-84: Needs Polish
Functional and native, but missing critical design finesse or accessibility details.

### 🔴 <70: High Risk
Significant violations. Likely to be rejected by App Store review or provide poor UX.

---

## Primary Recommendations:
1. [Recommendation 1]
2. [Recommendation 2]
3. [Recommendation 3]